Back to the Homepage
german version

An easy guide to build yourself a PC
Hardwaretests: Testresults and benchmarks
Viruses: Prophylaxis, identification, removal

All About PC - get in contact
All About PC - Impressum
Links

 Latest Reviews 

Click to read the review!
ABIT VP6
Click to read the review!
ASUS A7V133
Click to read the review!
EPOX 8KTA3+
Click to read the review!
DEEP OCEAN SCREEN SAVER

 ABIT Siluro T400 
 Review 


Overview:
Introduction
The Card
Test Systems
Quake III Arena
3DMark 2001
3DMark 2001, Continued
SpecViewPerf
Overclocking & Conclusions
Author: A.Wei
 Reviews 
wkda_adv1_ermitteln_468x60

ABIT Siluro T400


Quake III Arena

Quake III Arena Timedemo 1 was the first test we ran. At the "Fastest" there were no big surprises, except that with the P4 the T400 gave almost no improvement over the GF2 MX. This is where we had expected to see the greatest difference, as the core clock's extra 25MHz could perform without being hindered by the limited memory bandwidth.



At "Normal," we see more of the same, but with the Athlon, the T400's advantage over the GF2 MX decreases as the memory bandwidth strain starts to show. Again, with the P4, the T400's advantage over the GF2 MX is negligible, and the GF256 with its 120MHz core is left way in the dust. 



With "High Quality" came the big surprises. We had expected to see the difference between the two MXes level off here, but with the Athlon, it remained about the same, and with the P4, the T400 finally took off:

 

Copyright All-About-PC. All rights reserved. 
All information on this Website is protected by All- About-PC. Reproduction and/or sale in any form without agreement of the publisher is forbidden. All information on this website has been thoroughly researched and as far as is possible has been verified by secondary sources, but we can not take responsibility for the content or for any damages incurred by using this information.